Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Nick H's avatar

I have to disagree on the original of "The Sound of Silence" being better than the cover. In theory I shouldn't like the cover. I'm a big fan of vocal harmony - the original is an excellent duet and the cover is sung as a solo. I generally dislike (and in many cases despise) nu-metal or grunge or whatever genre it is that Disturbed falls in.

But I think the cover here is better. I suppose you could make the argument that the contradiction between the pleasant harmonies of Simon and Garfunkel and the bleak imagery of Simon's lyrics is what makes the song work, but I think it just dilutes it. The original drags; the cover builds. It takes the lyrics seriously. Musically, the cover is stronger too. Draiman has some real range, and he shows it off here. He's singing with power, but it's still singing and not screaming. I like the piano and strings better for this song than the original's acoustic guitar and snare drum. Overall it's just an improvement in almost every way.

1 more comment...

No posts

Ready for more?